Completely disinterested in case resolution. Reviews zero docs, evidence. Orders repeated 730 evals. Clearly favors certain attorneys. Often seems confused about the law. Witnessed him "play Dr." and suggest a child's diagnosis may be a mistake? Very inappropriate.
I see ONE review here...which matches what the web site says...but the review shoes that the writer gave Judge Belz (OC, CA) just ONE STAR (not three, which the web site summary inducates). I want to trust the site, but it's a concern to see such a variance. I couldn't tell where else to submit this observation. Thank you for addressing it.